neurosciencestuff:

How Neuroscience is Changing the Talking Cure

What’s the Latest Development?
A new book which attempts to reconcile psychoanalysis with neuroscience may have practical implications in the treatment of neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s and PTSD. Catherine Malabou’s What Should We Do With Our Brain? argues that “we have failed to understand ourselves because we have failed to acknowledge recent scientific discoveries, particularly ‘plasticity,’ or the brain’s ability to change.” Through the course of the argument, Malabou updates psychotherapy’s concept of clinical treatment by recognizing that mental wounds do not come from a buried subconscious but from events that befall us in the real world.
What’s the Big Idea?
Malabou references clinical trials with patients who have acquired neurological disorders (rather than being born with them) and finds that patients do not identify with a stable psyche—the sort required by traditional psychological investigation. Rather, patients experience themselves as a different person, one with whom they are unfamiliar. “The old onion of the psyche, with its layers upon layers of meaning, is simply not there to peel apart in analysis; rather, it has been replaced by a new self, which requires a different clinical approach.”


Except for the astonishingly poor choice of stock photography, this is pretty interesting.

neurosciencestuff:

How Neuroscience is Changing the Talking Cure

What’s the Latest Development?

A new book which attempts to reconcile psychoanalysis with neuroscience may have practical implications in the treatment of neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s and PTSD. Catherine Malabou’s What Should We Do With Our Brain? argues that “we have failed to understand ourselves because we have failed to acknowledge recent scientific discoveries, particularly ‘plasticity,’ or the brain’s ability to change.” Through the course of the argument, Malabou updates psychotherapy’s concept of clinical treatment by recognizing that mental wounds do not come from a buried subconscious but from events that befall us in the real world.

What’s the Big Idea?

Malabou references clinical trials with patients who have acquired neurological disorders (rather than being born with them) and finds that patients do not identify with a stable psychethe sort required by traditional psychological investigation. Rather, patients experience themselves as a different person, one with whom they are unfamiliar. “The old onion of the psyche, with its layers upon layers of meaning, is simply not there to peel apart in analysis; rather, it has been replaced by a new self, which requires a different clinical approach.”

Except for the astonishingly poor choice of stock photography, this is pretty interesting.

Reblogged from Neuroscience
  1. saltedcarthage reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  2. angelo-saxon reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  3. mppsyd reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  4. argentarachnids reblogged this from scinerds
  5. em-pt-ily reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  6. rori5000 reblogged this from kenobi-wan-obi
  7. bartholomewfromthesun reblogged this from scinerds and added:
    This sounds really interesting, something somewhat related to this…when I was working as a counselor some of the other...
  8. decayingsense reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  9. thereluctantoptimist reblogged this from thartist72
  10. mmmindreader reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  11. nunegro reblogged this from kenobi-wan-obi
  12. thartist72 reblogged this from scinerds
  13. swancensus reblogged this from doctor-with-a-blue-box
  14. doctor-with-a-blue-box reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  15. digger-nicks reblogged this from kenobi-wan-obi
  16. nathannazareth reblogged this from chanceblisken
  17. perdito reblogged this from slavin
  18. withcuriosity reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  19. chanceblisken reblogged this from kenobi-wan-obi
  20. inochi-merodi reblogged this from neurosciencestuff